Saul's Music Space

Started by Saul, December 04, 2009, 10:53:16 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Saul

Quote from: Mirror Image on October 17, 2010, 07:37:56 PM

Get a music teacher. Learn how to properly notate music. You don't have a clue what you're doing.

The Egoguru has spoken...

Can you catch some eggs?


Mirror Image

Quote from: Saul on October 17, 2010, 07:39:05 PM
The Egoguru has spoken...

Can you catch some eggs?

I thought you were ignoring me? Seems like I'm getting through to you. GET A MUSIC TEACHER. LEARN HOW TO PROPERLY NOTATE MUSIC. COMPOSE MUSIC THAT MEANS SOMETHING.

You will continue to go unperformed if you do not change your poor composing habits.



(poco) Sforzando

Quote from: Philoctetes on October 17, 2010, 07:28:48 PM
Are Saul and MI the same person? I'm having difficulty differentiating their posts.

Saul's the one who writes music that gets rave reviews on YouTube.
"I don't know what sforzando means, though it clearly means something."

Philoctetes

Quote from: Sforzando on October 17, 2010, 08:01:25 PM
Saul's the one who writes music that gets rave reviews on YouTube.

Ah..

That's true, Mr. No. I don't know how that could have slipped my mind.

(poco) Sforzando

Quote from: Philoctetes on October 17, 2010, 08:02:02 PM
Ah..

That's true, Mr. No. I don't know how that could have slipped my mind.

I am now named for a genre of Japanese drama?
"I don't know what sforzando means, though it clearly means something."

Philoctetes

Quote from: Sforzando on October 17, 2010, 08:04:09 PM
I am now named for a genre of Japanese drama?

Most definitely an honor.

Luke

This utterly hilarious series of posts seems to have gone unnoticed (hilarious beause of Saul's final stunning riposte, that is)

Quote from: Greg on October 17, 2010, 04:33:00 PM
....Btw, that piece wasn't bad, but whoa!!! That's supposed to be in 6/8 time or something... (maybe 12/8 would work? idk) And why is the violin part under the piano part. Reading something like that is extremely disorienting, when the score of every violin sonata I've ever seen has the violin part on top.

Quote from: Saul on October 17, 2010, 04:35:35 PM
Blame Finale... :D

Quote from: Greg on October 17, 2010, 04:37:31 PM
Sibelius is much better man... seriously... have you tried it?

Quote from: Saul on October 17, 2010, 04:41:44 PM
No I didnt...

What's the price?

Quote from: Greg on October 17, 2010, 04:49:30 PM
Same as Finale, unfortunately.

Quote from: k a rl h e nn i ng on October 17, 2010, 05:41:44 PM
Notation software is of limited use to one who doesn't know how to notate music properly.

Quote from: Sforzando on October 17, 2010, 05:53:44 PM
Finale doesn't let you use 6/8 as a time signature; it automatically converts such rhythms to 4/4. And it requires violin parts to be placed lower than piano parts.

Quote from: Saul on October 17, 2010, 05:55:14 PM
Did you hear what Mr. No said, Karl?

;D ;D ;D

More seriously, I rejoined this thread after a few hours away to this post by Saul:

Quote from: Saul on October 17, 2010, 12:00:56 PM
I thought that I agreed with those points, not every composer knows anything about everything, its a life long study.

and I wanted to say that, yes, of course it's a lifelong study, even a composer with hunreds of fine work, commissions, performances etc. under his belt like Karl knows full well that his music can still develop, can become even better, faultless though it is on the technical and notational level (did you notice, btw, when he was composing that viola sonata that you hate, that he consulted with violists and other string players, and pianists too, all along the way, so that the thing could acually be played?). But that the errors people have tried to help you with are not tiny details, they are huge whopping great first-lessons-out-of-the-textbook ones. There is a difference, you know.

karlhenning

YouTube gods do not need textbooks!

Saul


Gurn Blanston

Quote from: Mirror Image on October 17, 2010, 07:30:57 PM

Good point. I'm done talking to Saul. He'll never listen to anybody and sure as hell won't take anybody's advice.

This is a good thought. Now would be a great time to take your own advice because if you keep going down this road the label "miserable Internet stalker' will somehow seem appropriate. I know there are lots of things that you're interested in, let's pursue some of them, shall we? :)

Thanks,
GB
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

Saul

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on October 18, 2010, 04:19:10 AM
This is a good thought. Now would be a great time to take your own advice because if you keep going down this road the label "miserable Internet stalker' will somehow seem appropriate. I know there are lots of things that you're interested in, let's pursue some of them, shall we? :)

Thanks,
GB

LOL Gurn!

You're the best!

:D ;D :)

karlhenning

Quote from: The YouTube godYou believe that [Henning's] work is beyond critisizm [sic] just because he happened to write it correctly?

Correct music can be ugly too.

The first statement is a strawman. Sforz is fair-minded, and I do not imagine he considers any work, even correctly written, as "beyond criticism" (which is more than we can say for your spelling).

The second statement is, in the abstract, true, but irrelevant in this case.  Music is not "ugly" just because you don't like it, don't understand it, and cannot write anything anywhere near its professionalism.  There are stretches of the Viola Sonata which, indeed, I wrote specifically to the end that they shoud be as beautiful as I might achieve.

This is one difference between Sforz and yourself. Sforz is fair-minded.  You think that you get to pronounce to the world what art is "ugly."

There's a phrase you used earlier, which you in fact misused, because to all appearances you used it as code for your narrow-minded scorn.  I use it here in its true capacity: I pity you.

greg

Quote from: Luke on October 17, 2010, 10:39:16 PM
This utterly hilarious series of posts seems to have gone unnoticed (hilarious beause of Saul's final stunning riposte, that is)

;D ;D ;D

I actually had to reread that. Wow.  :D

greg

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on October 18, 2010, 04:19:10 AM
This is a good thought. Now would be a great time to take your own advice because if you keep going down this road the label "miserable Internet stalker' will somehow seem appropriate. I know there are lots of things that you're interested in, let's pursue some of them, shall we? :)

Thanks,
GB
Interesting label. MI should just give up, because he is starting to appear that way. Intentions are good, but it's all in vain because Saul will never become more self-critical.

knight66

I am just not with this at all. If, as various of you suggest, Saul is unteachable....why do you put the continued effort into picking over his compositions?

Surely there are other threads where your posts will provide legitimate pleasure to others.

Most of us don't see much of the world in the way Saul perceives it; equally, he is not amenable to altering his own stances and most posts here are futile in their ostensible purpose.

If the real idea here is to poke sticks through the bars, well, it is not a worthy objective.

Knight
DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.

bhodges

Quote from: knight on October 18, 2010, 02:03:03 PM
I am just not with this at all. If, as various of you suggest, Saul is unteachable....why do you put the continued effort into picking over his compositions?

Word.

--Bruce

Philoctetes

Man, maybe there is a conspiracy?!  :o