Personality Types

Started by greg, July 22, 2008, 07:24:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Philoctetes

People who have to mention that they are special, generally aren't.

Iago

Quote from: Philoctetes on July 25, 2008, 09:43:09 AM
People who have to mention that they are special, generally aren't.

Bravo!!!
"Good", is NOT good enough, when "better" is expected

Lethevich

Quote from: Philoctetes on July 25, 2008, 09:43:09 AM
People who have to mention that they are special, generally aren't.

Is this some reverse-psychology in action? ¬_____¬
Peanut butter, flour and sugar do not make cookies. They make FIRE.

Philoctetes

Quote from: Lethe on July 25, 2008, 09:58:44 AM
Is this some reverse-psychology in action? ¬_____¬

More flat aside.

Josquin des Prez

Quote from: Philoctetes on July 25, 2008, 09:43:09 AM
People who have to mention that they are special, generally aren't.

Wagner proves you wrong.

greg

Quote from: Josquin des Prez on July 25, 2008, 10:05:11 AM
Wagner proves you wrong.
He did say "generally"...... which is more or less so, since there's also Saul out there.

Gurn Blanston

Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

knight66

Gurn, With Global Warming and the increased pressure on natural resources an'all, you sure take up a lotta space with two words.

Mike
DavidW: Yeah Mike doesn't get angry, he gets even.
I wasted time: and time wasted me.

Gurn Blanston

Quote from: knight on July 25, 2008, 10:22:32 AM
Gurn, With Global Warming and the increased pressure on natural resources an'all, you sure take up a lotta space with two words.

Mike

I assume you mean in import... :)  Merci, mon ami.

8)
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

Josquin des Prez


Philoctetes

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on July 25, 2008, 10:19:57 AM
Ummm, no.  ::)

8)

I suppose he could be considered a good composer.

Gurn Blanston

Quote from: Philoctetes on July 25, 2008, 10:27:13 AM
I suppose he could be considered a good composer.

Oh, backing off now, eh?   :P

8)
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

Philoctetes

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on July 25, 2008, 10:33:11 AM
Oh, backing off now, eh?   :P

8)

Just saying that semantically; I could potentially get stretched that far.

eyeresist


I'm special, but only in the euphemistic sense.


Renfield

Quote from: knight on July 25, 2008, 09:21:03 AM
All they really wanted was headlines with which to label people.

Exactly. And that, in my humble opinion, is what rests in the fetid heart of each and every one of those personality test crowd/state-pleasers..

"Leave the psychometry to psychology: tests only in research context", says deranged student. Here's a headline. 8)


(I'm still harassing, aren't I? Yes, I think I am. Blast.)


Joe Barron

I took this personality test once, and failed.

greg

Quote from: The Ardent Pelleastre on October 21, 2008, 11:22:23 AM
ISFJ.

http://www.personalitypage.com/ISFJ.html
You'd make a great father.  8)



Just got back from school, where at the end of the day we spent an hour or so in a classroom with a few other classes and a speaker talking about these personality types.


We took the tests before going into the classroom and here's mine:
Introverted 96%
Intuitive 86%
Thinking 80%
Judging 77%


obviously way out of balance!

anyways....... i was about to bring up a million points and ask a question, but now I don't feel like it. Says a lot......

greg

Just have to add one thing. Arnold Schoenberg had to have been an INTJ. If not, then close. Maybe ENTJ. Developing a whole new system of music, and everything.....

other INTJs include Arnold Schwazenegger, CS Lewis and JFK.

random information i'd like to get out of my system.  ::)

greg

I got a sheet of paper explaining the different types and it seems to me that taking a test to determine your type is a waste of time. Just reading the explanations is more accurate. On the first page of the thread, the last letter i got was P, and the test I just took gave me a J.  ::)
So, after reading the descriptions, the obvious category is simply a strong IN__, the last two being whatever mood I'm in- the most variable.

Also, I realized an important point here...... Intuitive types can't work very systematically- and this relates to composing as well. A lot of composers might be able to work with composing a little each day, steadily (i read in an interview that Penderecki does just that), but that's the Sensing type, and Intuitive types work from random bursts of inspiration, with long, dry periods in between.  :P