The Classical Style

Started by DavidW, May 24, 2007, 04:47:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Fëanor

Quote from: Corey on October 16, 2007, 04:10:28 PM
...
I would also like to note that there are other composers whose music is more apt to be misconstrued as "manipulative." Schumann is quite emotionally tame as opposed to say, R. Strauss.

Not a big favorite of mine either, R. Strauss.  Take the Four Last Songs ... please.

Florestan

Quote from: Feanor on October 16, 2007, 08:42:31 AM
You like broccoli, I like spinach -- don't take it so personally.

Oh, but I didn't. I just reacted to a grossly exaggerated statement of yours.

Quote from: Feanor on October 16, 2007, 08:42:31 AM"Puke, retch":  so sorry, a bit of hyperbole on my part.  Then again, "... as one of the greatest achievements of the human spirit" at applied to Schumann's music sounds a bit hyperbolic to me.  :P

It is hyperbolic, but had I written just "Hey, I like Schumann", would you still have regretted your words? :)

Quote from: Feanor on October 16, 2007, 08:42:31 AMViva the 2nd Viennese School.  Viva Elliot Carter.  Viva Iannis Xenakis.  Viva Karlheinz Stockhausen.

I don't like this kind of music, neither shall I deride or insult it. Instead, I heartily join you: Vivat all of them!
"Great music is that which penetrates the ear with facility and leaves the memory with difficulty. Magical music never leaves the memory." — Thomas Beecham

Haffner

Quote from: Feanor on October 14, 2007, 06:19:04 AM

Again for me, the Romantic era is really about the shameless exploitation of emotion and sentimentality, an often self-indulgent wallowing in these feelings.  I'm definitely not a Romantic era fan, although some romantics like, maybe, Berlioz, are fun, and some like say, Dvorak, just don't get too carried way.  But Schumann for example, it's puke, retch as far as I'm concerned.




Right.

Haffner

Quote from: Florestan on October 16, 2007, 02:57:25 AM
Thank you for this very illuminating and mind-opening post. I've always considered Romanticism in general - and Schumann's music in particular - as one of the greatest achievements of the human spirit, but now I've seen the light and I repent my sins. Once again, thank you!





Can I please join the ranks of the converted as well? Can I huh huh :D :D :D?

Haffner

Quote from: Feanor on October 16, 2007, 06:21:49 PM
Not a big favorite of mine either, R. Strauss.  Take the Four Last Songs ... please.





Ah.

longears

Quote from: Feanor on October 16, 2007, 06:21:49 PM
Not a big favorite of mine either, R. Strauss.  Take the Four Last Songs ... please.
Happily.  They'll go to the desert island with me--but probably nothing else by Strauss.  I don't care a lot for Schumann, either, but not for his wallowing, rather because he rarely takes flight--for me.

Fëanor

Quote from: Florestan on October 17, 2007, 02:41:53 AM
Oh, but I didn't. I just reacted to a grossly exaggerated statement of yours.

It is hyperbolic, but had I written just "Hey, I like Schumann", would you still have regretted your words? :)

I don't like this kind of music, neither shall I deride or insult it. Instead, I heartily join you: Vivat all of them!

Peace, Florestan,

Yes, I reget my words, though not the underlying sentiment.  Schumann's statute is secure with or without my endorsement, and I don't doubt his craftsmanship though I haven't got the technical skills to fully appreciate them.

As for the contemporary composers, I can appreciate that they aren't everyone's cup of tea.  I won't try to persuade you that you ought to like them.  0:)

Fëanor

#127
Quote from: longears on October 18, 2007, 05:46:46 AM
Happily.  They'll go to the desert island with me--but probably nothing else by Strauss.  I don't care a lot for Schumann, either, but not for his wallowing, rather because he rarely takes flight--for me.

This is sort of my problem with Brahms.  His music is uniformally bland to me:  I prefer stuff with a bit more "grit".  This would be why I prefer, say, Janacek or Shostakovich.

longears

Quote from: Feanor on October 19, 2007, 06:57:30 AM
This is sort of my problem with Brahms.  His music is uniformally bland to me:  I prefer stuff with a bit more "grit".  This would be why I prefer, say, Janacek or Shostakovich.
I can relate to that, and like the idea of "grit" to characterize it.  Sort of captures why I like Adams and Reich but most of Glass sounds like background music.  Of course, not all grit is on the surface.  Sibelius in particular seems deceptive in that way.  And I think Brahms does have grit, but often it's been polished to a near-glassy smoothness.  Also noted for grit are Stravinsky and Prokofiev.  I hear it occasionally in those mid-19th Century Germanic Romantics--Death and the Maiden hastens to mind--but not consistently enough to keep me intrigued. 


Fëanor

Quote from: longears on October 20, 2007, 07:34:33 AM
I can relate to that, and like the idea of "grit" to characterize it.  Sort of captures why I like Adams and Reich but most of Glass sounds like background music.  Of course, not all grit is on the surface.  Sibelius in particular seems deceptive in that way.  And I think Brahms does have grit, but often it's been polished to a near-glassy smoothness.  Also noted for grit are Stravinsky and Prokofiev.  I hear it occasionally in those mid-19th Century Germanic Romantics--Death and the Maiden hastens to mind--but not consistently enough to keep me intrigued. 


As I reply, I've just finished listening to Sibelius' Symphony No.7.  I have a way to go with Sibelius, but I must say there is a definite sense of drama and tension underlying that work, if not precisely "grit".

Gritty or not, and Romantic or not, Schubert is one of my favorite composers.  It's mind-bogglying to consider what his output would have been if he had composed for another 30 or 40 years.

Gurn Blanston

It sure seems like we've drifted a long way from The Classical Style. Pity, really, since we had barely scratched the surface.   ::)

----------------
Now playing: Berlioz Harold en Italie & Les Troyens - London SO / Colin Davis - Berlioz Harold in Italy pt 3 - Serenade of an Abruzzian Mountain Dweller to his Mistress: Allegro assai - Allegretto
Visit my Haydn blog: HaydnSeek

Haydn: that genius of vulgar music who induces an inordinate thirst for beer - Mily Balakirev (1860)

DavidW

Quote from: Gurn Blanston on October 21, 2007, 01:49:43 PM
It sure seems like we've drifted a long way from The Classical Style. Pity, really, since we had barely scratched the surface.   ::)

I take full blame for abandoning a project nearly as soon as I started it. :-[

BachQ

Quote from: Feanor on October 19, 2007, 06:57:30 AM
This is sort of my problem with Brahms.  His music is uniformally bland to me: 

Funny, Brahms is the least "bland" composer I know .........

Ten thumbs

In essence the classical style ought to contain pure beautiful lines. Perhaps after the fashion of Palladio. I think Mozart comes nearest to this ideal. Someone once complained to me that Mozart never got anywhere. That of course is because he is there already, right from the first note. Ultimately Classicism becomes far more complex but we can still see its roots. Those of you who dislike emotional manipulation obviously hate the movies where it is stock in trade. How is it done? It's done through continuous tension, and drama too. I find the definition of 'grit' airy-fairy but then I come from the North of England. We know about grit up here. Anyway there's more anger and violence in Schubert's music than you'll ever find in Stravinsky's.
A day may be a destiny; for life
Lives in but little—but that little teems
With some one chance, the balance of all time:
A look—a word—and we are wholly changed.

Fëanor

Quote from: Dm on January 16, 2008, 08:52:29 PM
Funny, Brahms is the least "bland" composer I know .........

One is temped to say, Don't know many composers, eh?  But I will forbear.

Haffner

Quote from: Feanor on January 22, 2008, 05:08:41 PM
One is temped to say, Don't know many composers, eh?  But I will forbear.





How wonderful to have such a gracious, discriminating person on this forum.

Fëanor

#136
Quote from: Haffner on January 23, 2008, 02:07:40 PM


How wonderful to have such a gracious, discriminating person on this forum.

To whom are you referring?  Dm or myself?  If Dm insists that Brahms is the least bland composer he know, then perhaps he should have to grace to ante up a few examples of non-bland Brahms music.  I dare say Dm is more erudite than I, and I'm prepared to be educated.

... Or perhaps you, Haffner, will do so.  In this thread your contributions have been mostly one-liners.  Do you suppose that your 2000-odd posts put you above criticism and entitled to make snide remarks unquestioned?

Haffner

#137
Quote from: Feanor on January 27, 2008, 03:37:18 AM
... Or perhaps you, Haffner, will do so.  In this thread your contributions have been mostly one-liners.  Do you suppose that your 2000-odd posts put you above criticism and entitled to make snide remarks unquestioned?



No. I `hope that I don't give that impression by accident. I certainly don't intend to be snide. Some posters appear to me to write things without thinking adequately.

But that's my opinion. I'm just some bumf**k guitar teacher in Burlington, Vermont. Not exactly a prisitine sort of person.

Fëanor

Quote from: Haffner on January 27, 2008, 05:13:24 AM

No. I `hope that I don't give that impression by accident. I certainly don't intend to be snide. Some posters appear to me to write things without thinking adequately.


OK.  I hope you and I can called it equal then.  Peace.

arkiv

Johann Georg Albrechtsberger could be a representation of the epitome of cyclonic classicism.